Showing posts with label Burnett's nail. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Burnett's nail. Show all posts

Friday, 7 March 2008

Hypothetical ramblings


There's been a lot of focus on Janssen's status being determined by the health of BJ Ryan. I think they're looking at the wrong player. Regardless of Ryan's status; League, Accardo, Downs, Frasor & Tallet should be able to handle the 7th through 9th innings without a significant problem, whether or not Ryan's ready to roll. And let's face it, Janssen would pretty much be doing the 7th-8th innings within a week of Ryan being healthy. What a waste of his arm that'd be.

I don't agree that a player should determine Janssen's fate - other than Casey's performance. And to date, it's been pretty damn good. But that aside, if I had to pick a player to determine Janssen's fate, it'd be AJ.

Obviously this is just a random thought on my part, but how many of you believe this nail problem of AJ's is as simple as it sounds? Maybe I'm jaded by the fact BJ's doctor said they were rushing him, as I suspected they were. Maybe it's because last year, they told us Ryan's back was a problem, and he ended up getting surgery on the elbow. But you know what they say, the elbow's connected to the - spinal cord...

While I have no real evidence to prove this, I just want to focus on a hypothetical situation. What if AJ isn't ready go opening day? There's obviously no evidence he can't, but let's say his nail still isn't good to go. He isn't going to throw his fastball all day, and his change up has a neon "hit me" sign on it. So if he doesn't have Uncle Charlie, he might not be capable of starting as the #2.

While this is an overreaction, but what it does bring up is the importance of Janssen in the rotation. If Casey is the #5, and AJ isn't ready, we can bring up Janssen to the 4 and Litsch becomes the 5 (or another player if we don't wanna screw with his service time...although I'm drawing a blank as to who...doesn't smell like victory to me). However, if Litsch or even Mr. Victory himself starts off as the #5, and Janssen is headed for the pen, this could cause a problem.

Now, my point is less effective at the start of the season. Janssen is being prepped to start now, so if AJ starts on the d/l Janssen can still be put in the rotation. But again, looking further into the season if a starter gets injured, having Janssen in the rotation means we've got solid options behind him. If Litsch or another is the 5, and Janssen is in the pen, all of our rotation depth disappears.

I'll stop now that I'm rambling, but I'm definetly more worried about AJ than I should be...

Twitchy.

Monday, 3 March 2008

Morning Roundup

Are you expressing shock that AJ Burnett is the first Jay to suffer an injury this year? If so, why?

Burnett tore the nail on his right index finger while "closing" (hrm, euphemism for "slamming during a temper tantrum"?) a car door prior to his arrival at Dunedin. Well, at least he didn't get his junk caught in his zipper, because that's really, really painful. I know because I did it once when I was 4.

This little incident means no curve balls for two weeks, when the nail is expected to have grown back. This shouldn't be a big deal, and if anything, it'll give him time to work on his change, which he might want to work in more often this year (to keep his arm from exploding as it has the last two seasons). Moving along...

I don't know if any of you have heard, but David Eckstein is a scrappy little player with a big heart. Shhhhhsh! Don't tell anybody!

Wilner notes that AJ is a bit testy about the car door thing, Reed is running as well as we was in '06, Overbay's been scorching the ball like it's '06, and he'll be live blogging today's game with the Tribe. Cheers, biggie!

ELSEWHERE:

Reds 1B Joey Votto has nothing but a 38-year-old Scott "homerun" Hatterberg standing between him and everyday duties in Cincy. The Etobicoke native had a blistering September callup last year (.321/.260/548 in 84 ABs) and projects to be a .270+, 25 HR hitter who swipes the odd bag.

Hatterberg is a former Bosox catcher, as if you needed any further reason to cheer against him.

Young stars Cole Hamels and Prince Fielder are both unhappy with what arbitration has yielded for them. Sorry, fellas, but the six years of indentured servitude at the beginning of a player's ML career are all that keeps the sport from going off the rails like a crazy train.

Part of the problem is no doubt the system where massive, multi-million dollar draft bonuses (such as $2 million in Hamels' case) are handed out to first round picks, followed by a less than $400,000 in salary for their first full year in the majors. They're bound to get discombobulated with the massive sum followed by a relative pittance. Onwards and upwards, right? Well, not so fast. Still, it seems like kids these days have all the patience of a 6-year-old.

Fielder (who got a $2.4 million bonus) really does come off as a petulant little brat, though. And how could you feud with a loveable face like this?

-- Johnny Was